Static Site Generators Are Easy to Use…Right?

15 Aug 2022

I’ve had this post in my drafts folder for months now Actually, it’s ever since I realised how hard it is to manage content with Static Site Generators, and flipped back to WordPress.

I had some rough notes, but never got around to writing the post out in a long-form. Here’s my notes:

Then I read a post by Florens Verschelde, entitled Static Site Generators, where he said everything I wanted to say and then some. So why re-invent the wheel?

It turns out that static site generators are terrible at handling content. Which is too bad, because that’s one of their very few features to begin with.

Florens Verschelde

Static Site Generators

by Florens Verchelde

I’ve been looking for a decent static site generator to build a simple, 10-page-or-so documentation site, and I’m failing. Here are some notes on my journey, to serve as a warning sign to future travellers, and thoughts on what static site generators could do better.

Read the post…

I know there are many people who read this blog and use Static Site Generators. What do you think? Are Florens and I missing something here? Please let me know by using the reply by email button below.

← The one before
Will the IndieWeb Ever Become Mainstream?

Up next →
Heaven’s River (Bobiverse Book 4)

Reply via email

Did you enjoy this post?

Why not buy me a coffee? It helps support the site and caffeinates me so I can keep producing content.

Thank you! 🙏